Caulk
Introduction
Caulk actually is very useful for sealing areas of your map against the void. Caulk is transparent, and shows the portalsky through it, as well as any func_statics that touch your current vis leaf. That means you can cut a func_static house in half with a caulk brush, and still see both sides of it. Using portalsky this would not be posssible. [This now depends on portalsky mode--see [1].]
The rest of this article details using caulk to hide unnecessary tris, which is far less useful.
Caulk is a texture which gets not drawn in-game, but seals against the void. Its main use is to save a few polygons (tris), avoid z-fighting in certain situations and it can also be a mapper convenience tool. Usually people apply caulk on surfaces the player can never see in any circumstances. Caulking surfaces reduces the amount of tris, and thus improves performance in some cases. See attached image 1 for an example use of caulk.
Testing has revealed that the caulking your map does not have a significant impact on performance.
When not to use Caulk
There is no need to use caulk on any of these surfaces:
- worldspawn surfaces on the outside of the map in contact with the void
- worldspawn surfaces that are flush against another surface, for instance the bottom of a brush aligned with the floor
The game engine removes these surfaces automatically, so caulk texture is not needed.
When to use Caulk
- On func_static surfaces the player will never see, for example wall facing surfaces of prop windows and doors. Caulk can also be applied to worldspawn brush surfaces, which are entirely covered by detail work like patches. See image 2.
- You can eliminate z-fighting by caulking the other surface. Caulking also helps with vaults as seen in image 2: the caulked worldspawn surface does not "sparkle" or z-fight through the highest point of the vault, where the vault patch and the worldspawn brush are at equal height.
The Effect of Caulking on Performance
Every now and then, caulking rises up debates, whether or not it is useful or not. The basic question is, whether or not it is beneficial to spend a lot of time caulking and how much caulk is required to get a solid impact on fps rate. Recent tests performed by Sotha (Link) gave the following results.
Caulking a medium complex scene with tens of windows and other objects (Knighton Manor start) did NOT have any effect on fps counts. Caulking did save roughly 1000 tris, but this is not sufficient to cause any fps improvement. The main benefit of caulking was the decrease of memory usage: 1000 saved tris saved 0.6MB of memory.
Testing indicated that on a rather high-end computer increase of 23000 tris, 75 draws and 2500 shdw reduced the fps count by two. If a window consists of 5 brushes and the wall facing surfaces are caulked, this saves 5 surfaces and thus 10 tris per window. This would mean that 2300 windows should be caulked to get an improvement of 2fps. Basically this shows that caulking does not have much impact on modern hardware. However, on an older piece of hardware the amount of caulking needed for performance effect is lower, but even in this case it should be remembered that 1000 tris is roughly 20% of a single AI character.
How Should Caulk be Used?
It is not, according to these results, worthwhile to caulk existing maps, or to spend a lot of time caulking. Every saved tris help, of course, so the most beneficial course of action flow would be that the mappers integrate caulking in their ongoing work flow. If the mapper builds a func_static window he is going to clone and put everywhere, it is beneficial to use a few seconds to apply caulk on the source func_static and then get the caulking tris saving effect on all the clones. This does not add much work for the mapper, but will easily help the mapper to save the amount of tris in the range of thousand or two per medium sized scene where the windows and other cloned (but caulked) objects are present.
Also, some mappers prefer to caulk the exterior surfaces of their maps, even this is absolutely useless because the engine does this automatically. The benefit of this strategy is an editor thing: using the DR caulk filter the mapper can easily switch off the exterior surfaces and view easily inside the map to get a better vantage point. See image 3. The upmost image shows how mapping works for mapper who do not caulk the exterior. It is difficult to get a good overhead view of the work and the mapper has to either hide the exterior brushes or fly inside the map. The middle image shows how mapping works for mapper who do caulk the exterior, when caulk filter not active. The lowest image show how the mapping works when the caulk filter is activated. The mapper has a superior overhead view into his or her work. Similar result could be achieved by non-caulk-user by DR layers.
Conclusion
Mappers should not see extra trouble to get their work caulked since solid performance increases do not occur with the levels of tris saved by caulking. However, thousands of tris can be saved by simple workflow consideration, when working with objects which are cloned in large amounts. Caulking can also be a handy mapping aid.
